lawyers critique CC licenses
Over on Between Lawyers, they’re discussing the language (and opacity) of the CC contracts in comparison to open source licenses. Interesting stuff.
And: does anyone know of a case where a CC license has been interpreted yet? I haven’t heard of one.
Also: Federal Circuit to Decide Patentability of Crustless Sandwich.
Comments
Patenting a pbj? April fool, right? Right? Oh, pleeeease say it's a joke.
Posted by: senioritis | April 6, 2005 7:09 PM
Nope, not a joke. It involves the "uncrustables" frozen sandwiches.
Posted by: Krista | April 6, 2005 8:10 PM
With a name like crustless pb&j, it has to be patentable. Okay, so Smuckers was denied the crustless patent. I was starting to worry about who was going to be made to eat all that crust.
Posted by: Derek | April 9, 2005 9:43 AM